Why do you get to take a woman's created works from her? I understand feminist objectives seem to be in conflict with trans objectives, but this is a matter of intellectual property. Rowling can say whatever she wants and Harry Potter belongs to her. Them's facts.
Distraction-free reading. No ads.
Organize your knowledge with lists and highlights.
Tell your story. Find your audience.
Read member-only stories
Support writers you read most
Earn money for your writing
Listen to audio narrations
Read offline with the Medium app
That should be "the objectives of a tiny, reactionary subset of feminism whose exclusionist views are utterly rejected by the overwhelming majority of feminists". Please refrain from implying that right-wing anti-trans separatists represent the consensus feminist opinion on these issues.
--
